Cases
Houcks et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas et al
as 2:2023cv02489
Plaintiff: Michelle Houcks, Saundra Newsom, Niko Quinn and others
Defendant: Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas, Thomas (nmi) Dailey, James Swafford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WARES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14665
Plaintiff: SCOTT DENNIS WARES
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McIntyre, et al v. Golubski, et al
as 22-3115
Plaintiff / Appellee: LAMONTE MCINTYRE and ROSE LEE MCINTYRE
Defendant / Appellant: ROGER GOLUBSKI, Detective
Defendant: UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY AND KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, DENNIS WARE, Detective, JAMES L. BROWN, officer and others
Gioiosa v. Dzurenda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01805
Defendant: James Dzurenda and Dennis Ware
Plaintiff: Anthony Michael Gioiosa, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gioiosa v. Dzurenda et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01618
Defendant: James Dzurenda and Dennis Ware
Plaintiff: Anthony Michael Gioiosa, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McIntyre et al v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County and Kansas City, Kansas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02545
Defendant: Estate of James Michael Krstolich, Dennis Ware, W. K. Smith and others
Plaintiff: Lamonte McIntyre and Rose Lee McIntyre
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv01796
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bowling v. Miller, et al
as 09-3100
Plaintiff - Appellee: BARRON R. BOWLING
Defendant - Appellant: DENNIS WARE, STEVE CULP and ROBERT LANE, (Detective)
Defendant: UNIFIED GOVERNMENT OF WYANDOTTE COUNTY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and RONALD MILLER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?