Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 780
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Higgins, et al.
as 24-1500
Plaintiff: ALLIANCE FOR THE WILD ROCKIES
Defendant: JEANNE HIGGINS, Idaho Panhandle National Forest Supervisor, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE, an agency of the U.S. Department of Interior
North Cascades Conservation Council v. United States Forest Service, et al.
as 24-1422
Plaintiff: NORTH CASCADES CONSERVATION COUNCIL, A nonprofit Washington corporation
Defendant: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, A federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture and KRISTIN BAIL, In her official capacity as Forest Supervisor, Okanogan-Wenatchee National Forest, United States Forest Service
United States of America, et al. v. United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Eugene, et al.
as 24-684
Petitioner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTY GOLDFUSS, in her official capacity as Director of Council on Environmental Quality, SHAUN DONOVAN, in his official capacity as Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON, EUGENE
Defendant: STATE OF ALABAMA
Not Classified By Court: XIUHTEZCATL TONATIUH M., through his Guardian Tamara Roske-Martinez, ALEXANDER LOZNAK, JACOB LEBEL and others
Intervenor: THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS, AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE and others
Long v. State of Nevada et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01975
Plaintiff: George Jason Long
Defendant: State of Nevada, Nevada State, Clark County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Carpenter v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff: Kathy Carpenter
Defendant: United States of America, United States Department of Agriculture, United States Forest Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Sur Sur Mountain Rides Inc v. Department of Agriculture US Forest Service
as 5:2023cv06074
Plaintiff: Sur Sur Mountain Rides, Inc.
Defendant: Department of Agriculture US Forest Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Smith, et al. v. Tumalo Irrigation District, et al.
as 24-70
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW JAMES SMITH, PAUL CALLEN, KATHY POWELL and others
Defendant / Appellee: TUMALO IRRIGATION DISTRICT, RONALD ALVARADO, in his official capacity as State Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture and NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE, a federal agency of the United States Department of Agriculture
Central Oregon Wild Horse Coalition, et al. v. Vilsack, et al.
as 23-4260
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTRAL OREGON WILD HORSE COALITION, a non-profit organization, GAYLE HUNT, an individual and MELINDA KESTLER, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: TOM VILSACK, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, RANDY MOORE, Chief of the U.S. Forest Service, in his official capacity, GLENN CASAMASSA, Regional Forester, Pacific Northwest Region of the U.S. Forest Service, in his official capacity and others
Pratum Farm, LLC v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 6:2023cv01525
Plaintiff: Pratum Farm, LLC
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Western Watersheds Project, et al. v. Perdue, et al.
as 23-3872
Plaintiff / Appellant: WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, a non-profit organization and WILDERNESS WATCH, a non-profit organization
Defendant / Appellee: SONNY PERDUE, as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, a federal department, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, a federal agency and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?