Cases 1 - 10 of 892
Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Matthew Sherman Phillips
Defendant:
Governor Kay Ivey, John Hamm, Steven Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brunson v. Green et al
as 5:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Albert Brunson
Defendant:
Green, Howell and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State Of Alabama et al v. Casey
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
State Of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Kiley Casey
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps
as 2:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Florence v. Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Futral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kendarius DeAndre Butler
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Corizon Healthcare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byerley v. Ivey et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Steven Dale Byerley
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Christopher Randall Bailey
Defendant:
Kay Ivey and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawford v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jhamal Dwayne Crawford
Defendant:
The State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
