Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Thomas v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv06362
Respondent:
Thomas Brophy, Thomas E. Feeley, William P. Barr and others
Petitioner:
Harvel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jeh Johnson, et al v. Felix Lozano-Rodriguez
as 14-40739
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant - Appellant:
FELIX LOZANO-RODRIGUEZ
Serrano-Cosio v. USA, et al
as 2:2014cv00840
Respondent:
USA , United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner:
Regino Serrano-Cosio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ferguson v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al
as 4:2014cv00070
Plaintiff:
Roland Ferguson
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Griffith v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv20096
Plaintiff:
Andy Sandy Griffith
Defendant:
United States of America and US Department of Homeland Security Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Prophete v. Napolitano et al
as 1:2012cv21174
Plaintiff:
Luberice Prophete
Defendant:
Janet Napolitano and Department of Homeland Security (DHS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Vasiliu v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 5:2010cv01179
Movant:
Ioan John Vasiliu
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security and Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Livingston v. Pastrana et al
as 8:2008cv00526
Petitioner:
Brian Richard Livingston
Defendant:
Jorge Pastrana, Warden, United States Marshal Service and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gil Guerra v. Department of Homeland Security
as 1:2007cv21039
Plaintiff:
Pedro B. Gil Guerra
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
