Cases 31 - 40 of 1,334
Leopold et al v. U.S. Department of the Army
as 1:2024cv01496
Plaintiff:
Jason Leopold and Bloomberg L.P.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
PEARCE v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
REBA ABRAHAM PEARCE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Right to Privacy Act
Defend Arlington, et al v. DOD, et al
as 24-5026
Plaintiff:
Defend Arlington, Save Southern Heritage Florida, Friends of Judah P. Benjamin Camp of the Sons of Confederate Veterans and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin, III, William Laplante and others
Harris v. Department of the Army United States Claims Service
as 4:2024cv00578
Plaintiff:
Marquis Lamont Harris
Defendant:
Department of the Army United States Claims Service
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Greer v. Wormuth et al
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Roger E. Greer
Defendant:
Christine Wormuth and Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
perkins et al v. garland et al
as 1:2024cv00766
Plaintiff:
ronald oddelle perkins, Ronald Oddelle Perkins Estate et al., Kanika Glover Estate et al. and others
Defendant:
merrick garland attorney general et al., United States Department of Justice HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as MERRICK GARLAND, simon green ceo of the us dept. of ed. et al., United States Department of Education HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as SIMON GREEN, andrew saul commissioner et al., Social Security Administration HEIRS AND ASSIGNS doing business as ANDREW SAUL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
