Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Douglas Symmes, Jr. v. U.S. Department of Treasury
as 23-3452
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Douglas Roy Symmes, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
Symmes Jr v. US Department of Treasury
as 4:2023cv00162
Plaintiff:
Douglas Roy Symmes Jr
Defendant:
US Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Oates v. Benton County Jail et al
as 0:2022cv01714
Plaintiff:
Lovell Nahmour Oates
Defendant:
Benton County Jail, Minnesota Department of Corrections and United States Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2021cv00870
Plaintiff:
Arthur Lee Gates
Defendant:
Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCoy v. Department of Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv01099
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2021cv00935
Plaintiff:
Terry L McCoy
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Department of Treasury
as 6:2021cv03271
Plaintiff:
Johnny Anthony Ross
Defendant:
Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Department of Treasury et al
as 4:2021cv00242
Defendant:
Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Luther Wayne Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitts v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 4:2021cv00228
Defendant:
April Dyann Gibson, Department of Treasury, T Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00168
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
