Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Mayer v. Veterans Affairs
as 2:2022cv11442
Plaintiff:
Timothy P Mayer
Defendant:
US Dept of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Arrowhead Massage Therapy, LLC et al v. United States et al
as 3:2016cv03085
Plaintiff:
Arrowhead Massage Therapy, LLC and Mary Ann McGill
Defendant:
United States and U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Styles v. Dept of Veterans Affairs (JRG1)
as 2:2016cv00001
Plaintiff:
Arthur B Styles
Defendant:
Dept of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bajorek v. Veterans Affairs
as 2:2015cv14313
Plaintiff:
David A. Bajorek
Defendant:
US Dept of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kelly v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv15068
Plaintiff:
Michael A Kelly
Defendant:
Matthew Miller, Sec. Dept. of Veterans Affairs, U.S. Atty. Est. Dist. of Mich. and others
Church v. U.S. Government et al
as 3:2012cv00100
Plaintiff:
William L.A. Church
Defendant:
U.S. Government, USA, U.S. Dept. of Veteran's Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Church v. U.S. Government et al
as 3:2012mc00005
Plaintiff:
William L.A. Church
Defendant:
U.S. Government, USA, U.S. Dept. of Veteran's Affairs and others
BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. v. Bradley et al
as 2:2011cv00856
Plaintiff:
BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P.
Defendant:
Curtis S Bradley and Trisha Bradley
Thirdparty_defendant:
U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Curtis S Bradley and Trisha Bradley
Cross_claimant:
Trisha Bradley and Curtis S Bradley
Cross_defendant:
BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
