Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Watson v. Wexford Health Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00721
Plaintiff:
Jason LaBruce Watson, Jr
Defendant:
Wexford Health Inc, Alabama Dept of Corrections, Limestone County CF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kister v. Dunn, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00852
Plaintiff:
John Andrew Kister
Defendant:
Director of the Legal Division, Alabama Dept of Corrections and Jefferson S. Dunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carson v. Ivey et al
as 5:2020cv01151
Defendant:
Alabama Dept of Corrections, Governor Kay Ivey, Commissioner Jefferey Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Carson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luker v. Portis et al
as 1:2020cv00269
Defendant:
Johnny Portis and Alabama Dept. of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Clarence Luker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oryang v. Mitchum et al
as 2:2019cv01615
Defendant:
Alabama Dept of Corrections, Joseph Headley, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Bedogwar Oryang
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Alabama Dept of Correction et al
as 7:2019cv00480
Plaintiff:
Carl Lane Green
Defendant:
Loxley Work Center/Release, Alabama Dept of Correction, Bibb County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharifi v. Commissioner Ala Dept of Corrections
as 5:2017mc01604
Petitioner:
Mohammad Sharifi
Respondent:
Commissioner Ala Dept of Corrections
Barrow v. Ala. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lewis Barrow
Defendant:
Ala. Dept. of Corrections, Jeff Dunn, Director of Personnel Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison et al v. Holman Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2016cv00426
Plaintiff:
Tami Harrison and Jerry Harrison, Jr.
Defendant:
Holman Correctional Facility and Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Abston et al
as 7:2015cv01299
Plaintiff:
Marvin Davis, Jr
Defendant:
David Abston and Alabama Dept of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
