Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Antwan Carruthers v. Elkhart County Correctional Complex, et al
as 23-2031
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTWAN M. CARRUTHERS, also known as MRS. EYE KEYLA MY. CARRUTHERS WASHINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
ELKHART COUNTY CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX, ELKHART COUNTY JAIL and DEPUTY WILSON
Sanchez v. Hess et al
as 8:2022cv02854
Plaintiff:
Henry Sanchez, II
Defendant:
Deputy Hess and Deputy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Littlejohn v. Serra et al
as 1:2020cv03108
Defendant:
Deputy P. T. Serra, Deputy Allen, Deputy Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jermaine Lloyd v. Richard Roundtree, et al
as 1:2019cv00053
Defendant:
Sergeant Barber, Captain White, Captain Reeves and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. State of South Carolina et al
as 8:2018cv02596
Defendant:
Shannon Sturgill, Montford Shuler Caughman, State of South Carolina and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Alexander Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Aiken County Detention Center et al
as 9:2018cv02180
Defendant:
Nurse NFN Shellie, Lt Bowman, Deputy Gibson and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron Shah Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peake v. Reed et al
as 6:2017cv01395
Plaintiff:
Johnnie Adrian Peake
Defendant:
Angel Reed, James Staten, Donnie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingle v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 1:2017cv00101
Plaintiff:
Keenen D. Dingle
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions, Nurse Samboy and Deputy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. Sergeant Acuna et al
as 0:2016cv62842
Plaintiff:
Erik Kelly
Defendant:
Sergeant Acuna, Deputy Bellamy and Deputy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Grant v. Deputy Zeigler, et al
as 09-1295
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. GRANT
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPUTY ZEIGLER, DEPUTY MARCKE, DEPUTY JOEL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
