Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Smith, Jr. v. Warden, FCI Gilmer
as 5:2024cv00066
Petitioner:
Derrick Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Gilmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Marshall et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams
Defendant:
William Marshall, Jarrod Wilson, Jonathan Frame and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bain v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00042
Petitioner:
Tamien Derrick Bain
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adamson v. Givens et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Derrick Adamson
Defendant:
Pam Givens, Shirley Hamrick, Donald Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith, Jr. v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00177
Petitioner:
Derrick A. Smith, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bain v. Heckard
as 5:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Tamien Derrick Bain
Respondent:
K. Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rose v. West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Joshua Rose
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Correction and Rehabilitation, Brenda Ward, Greg Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clinton v. Groh et al
as 5:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
Gregory K. Clinton
Defendant:
Gina M. Groh, Robert W. Trumble, Anna Krasinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booker v. Hudgins et al
as 3:2021cv00067
Defendant:
Mr. M. Wilson, Mr. Y. Hong and Robert Hudgins
Plaintiff:
Derrick J. Booker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saunders v. Jividen et al
as 2:2021cv00250
Defendant:
CHP Tuney, Kim Thacker, AWS Frame and others
Plaintiff:
Quantel Saunders and Quauntel Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
