Cases 41 - 50 of 520
Crumpton v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv02612
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Derrick K. Crumpton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lewis v. Kingsport Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00114
Defendant:
Bristol Regional Hospital and Kingsport Police Department
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00136
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Taylor v. Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
as 3:2020cv00381
Petitioner:
Derrick S. Taylor
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Derrick et al v. District Attorney Office et al
as 3:2020cv00329
Plaintiff:
Steve Piphus, Deangelo Derrick, Jorge Perez and others
Defendant:
District Attorney Office, Criminal Court Clerk and City of Nashville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill et al v. Beauregard et al
as 2:2020cv02148
Plaintiff:
Otis Zirker, Donell Barton, Jr., Lamario Starks and others
Defendant:
Malaco Inc, BMG Rights Management US, Paul Beauregard and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Johnson v. GardaWorld Security Services
as 2:2020cv02130
Plaintiff:
Derrick Johnson
Defendant:
GardaWorld Security Services
Primm v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Rebecca Hunter, Tennessee Department of Human Resources, Debbie Inglis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Primm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pabon et al v. Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00139
Plaintiff:
Henry Pabon and Kelin Pabon
Defendant:
Vincent Emil Derrick and Swift Transportation Company of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
