Cases 1 - 10 of 656
Derrick L. Johnson v. California et al
as 2:2024cv03735
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Johnson
Defendant:
California, Starbucks Corporation, Alan I. Rubin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Derrick Lamar Hairston v. M. Lopez et al
as 5:2024cv00601
Petitioner:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Respondent:
M Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
(SS) Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00533
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lasean Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Nachison et al v. American Airlines, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00530
Plaintiff:
Ari Nachison, Shanna Nachison, Derrick Gallagher and others
Defendant:
American Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Tatum v. Torrealba et al
as 3:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tatum
Defendant:
Judge Shelly Torrealba, Joseph Valeriani and Christine J. Yi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hairston v. Lopez et al
as 3:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lamar Hairston
Defendant:
M. Lopez and G. Ephion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Derrick E. Fuller v. BMO Bank
as 2:2024cv01800
Plaintiff:
Derrick E. Fuller
Defendant:
BMO Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Collins II v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Derrick Collins II
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
