Cases 11 - 20 of 121
OWENS v. USA
as 1:2023cv00762
Petitioner:
DERRICK OWENS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CARDOSI v. DAUSS et al
as 1:2023cv00159
Plaintiff:
DERRICK CARDOSI
Defendant:
DAUSS and CENTURION MEDICAL PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOUGHERTY v. COUNTY OF VERMILLION, INDIANA et al
as 2:2022cv00579
Plaintiff:
DERRICK MATTHEW DOUGHERTY
Defendant:
COUNTY OF VERMILLION, INDIANA, TIM YOCUM and MIKE PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CLARK et al v. THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02120
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE CLARK, DERRICK BRONSON and DANIELLE CLARK AND DERRICK BRONSON
Defendant:
THE BOPPY COMPANY, LLC, ARTSANA U.S.A., INC. ARTSANA U.S.A., INC. D/B/A CHICCO, ARTSANA S.P.A. ARTSANA S.P.A. D/B/A ARTSANA GROUP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CARDOSI v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
DERRICK CARDOSI
Defendant:
ERIC J. HOLCOMB, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DAUSS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELMAR et al v. JONES et al
as 1:2022cv00624
Plaintiff:
DERRICK BELMAR and MARY SUTTON
Defendant:
ALLEN J JONES, CASS TRUCKING, INC. and ALLEN J. JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
SMITH v. WARDEN
as 2:2022cv00093
Petitioner:
DERRICK L. SMITH
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02680
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02525
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
