Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Harbison v. Thompson
as 3:2014cv00409
Plaintiff:
Edward Jerome Harbison
Defendant:
Evelyn Thompson, Michael Bryant, Derrick D. Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferris v. Schofield et al
as 1:2014cv01024
Plaintiff:
William J. Ferris, Sr.
Defendant:
Derrick D. Schofield, Jeff J. Tarver, Candace Prince and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirchner v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv01267
Plaintiff:
Kyle Kirchner
Defendant:
State of Tennessee , Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick D. Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mason v. Schofield et al
as 3:2013cv00357
Plaintiff:
Anton Tamir Mason
Defendant:
Derrick D Schofield, David Sexton, Doug Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pillow v. Schofield et al
as 1:2013cv00032
Plaintiff:
Timothy C. Pillow
Defendant:
Derrick D. Schofield, Jerry Lester, Rose Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Callis v. Miller et al
as 3:2012cv01052
Plaintiff:
George John Callis
Defendant:
James Miller, Derrick D. Schofield and Jerry Lester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. Tennessee Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Reynolds Matthews
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D Schofield, Charles Traughber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Avery v. Haslam et al
as 2:2012cv00367
Plaintiff:
David Avery
Defendant:
William Bill Haslam, Derrick D Schofield, David A Sexton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sanford v. Schofield et al
as 2:2012cv02685
Plaintiff:
Gerald A. Sanford, Sr.
Defendant:
Derrick D. Schofield, Jason Woodall, Rueben Hodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gay v. Lester et al
as 1:2012cv00050
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniel Gay
Defendant:
Jerry Lester, Ricky Mathis, Derrick D. Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
