Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Crawford v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv02407
Defendant:
Warden Dennis Bush, Warden Larry Cartledge and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Dexter Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2018cv01148
Plaintiff:
Devoun Bennett , Kelvin Bowen , Dexter Crawford and others
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Larry Cartledge and Dennis Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. South Carolina Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2014cv00862
Plaintiff:
Dexter Crawford
Defendant:
Byers, John Doe, Warden FNU Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montgomery v. United States of America
as 12-3928
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Montgomery, Jeffrey Freeman, Patrick Strozier and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lawrence L. Crawford, AKA Jonah Gabriel Jahjah Tishbite
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, 7th Circuit and 9th Circuit
Strozier v. United State
as 12-3890
Plaintiff:
Patrick Strozier, Stanley Dehart, III, Larry Allen and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lawrence L. Crawford, AKA Jonah Gabriel Jahjah Tishbite
Defendant - Appellee:
United States, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Great Britain and others
Montgomery et al v. United States of America et al
as 9:2012cv00527
Plaintiff:
Thomas B. Montgomery, Jeffrey Freeman, Patrick Strozier and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 7th Circuit and 9th Circuit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strozier et al v. United States et al
as 9:2012cv00333
Plaintiff:
Patrick Strozier, Stanley Dehart, III, Larry Allen and others
Defendant:
The United States, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Great Britain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Warden Lieber
as 3:2008cv02417
Petitioner:
Dexter Crawford
Respondent:
Warden Lieber
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
