Cases 1 - 10 of 32
DIAL v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER DIAL
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
CORBETT v. HOOKS et al
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
STANLEY EARL CORBETT, JR.
Defendant:
ERIK HOOKS, CHRISTOPHER RICH, KATY POOLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. DIAL
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
DALVECCIO T. THOMAS
Defendant:
SARGEANT DIAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. LEE et al
as 1:2023cv00111
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMA ANDERSON and ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
LEE, SALISBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, HONEYCUTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, TODD ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. GERNEGEN et al
as 1:2022cv01067
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
MS. BALRUS PERRIGAN GERNEGEN, MARCUS SCOTT, CAPTAIN MR. INGRAM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. RONNIE SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
DAVID MYERS and DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER RONNIE SCOTT, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, SGT. DIAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2022cv00150
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DHO REGINA HAMPTON, SGT. MS. NEALLY, CAPTAIN MR. COVINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MCAFEE v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2020cv00708
Defendant:
CORR. SGT. DIAL, CORR. LT. LOCKLEAR, CO CINDY RICHARDSON and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER MCAFEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
