Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Tolbert v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2023cv01996
Plaintiff:
Kim Evette Tolbert
Defendant:
Judge Diana Sullivan, Judge Nadia Woods, State of Nevada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bank v. The Hon. Melissa Saragosa
as 2:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Steven J. Bank
Respondent:
The Hon. Melissa Saragosa and Hon. Diana Sullivan, LV Justice Court
Interested Party:
Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bank v. Sullivan
as 2:2022cv01710
Petitioner:
Steven J. Bank
Respondent:
The Honorable Diana Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Douglas-McClain v. Pernyak et al
as 2:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Sean Edward Douglas-McClain
Defendant:
John Pernyak and Judge Diana Sullivan
Angulo v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2021cv00230
Defendant:
Cardyn Ellsworth, Diana Sullivan, Nancy Lemcke and others
Plaintiff:
Julio Angulo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bernard-Ex v. Molinar et al
as 2:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Eric Goodman, Mark Chambers, Erik Dockery and others
Plaintiff:
Clayton M Bernard-Ex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2019cv00036
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sansevero et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11872
Plaintiff:
Patricia Santanastaso, Terry Simmons, Samir Suero and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
White v. Burton et al
as 2:2014cv00930
Defendant:
Christopher F. Burton, Douglas Smith and Diana Sullivan
Plaintiff:
Keith White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reale et al v. Shea et al
as 2:2014cv00583
Defendant:
Karl Beavers, Jennifer Clark, Clark County and others
Plaintiff:
Aliana Reale, Debra Reale and Nicholas Reale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
