Cases 1 - 10 of 281
Smith v. Collier et al
as 5:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Warden Michael Feazell, Assistant Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. State of Mississippi
as 3:2023cv03097
Plaintiff:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joseph v. Dickerson et al
as 9:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Sherman Joseph, Sr
Defendant:
John Dickerson, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickerson v. TDCJ director C & D et al
as 3:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Terry Dickerson
Defendant:
TDCJ director C & D, Brandon Birmingham, Sarah Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Backus v. Glassel et al
as 9:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Caterrion Backus
Defendant:
Kent Glassel, Scott W. Grimm, Caulder R. Schwarz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Demison v. Collier et al
as 9:2023cv00177
Plaintiff:
Robert Demison, III
Defendant:
Brain Collier, Lorie Davis, William Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickerson v. King
as 23-60535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Justin Dewayne Dickerson
Defendant / Appellee:
Director Ron King and Warden Donald Jackson
Dickerson v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv03784
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Cunnie Ray Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Dickerson v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Terry Dickerson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Brandon Birmingham, Sarah Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baldwin v. Dickerson
as 9:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Ira James Baldwin
Defendant:
Daniel Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
