Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Hornemann v. Leal et al
as 1:2023cv01615
Plaintiff:
Dieter Hornemann
Defendant:
Tara Leal, Julia Barrera, Marina Mercado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Felder v. Ahern
as 4:2023cv03201
Petitioner:
Marcus Dieter Felder
Respondent:
Gregory J. Ahern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Felder v. GEO Group et al
as 4:2023cv02240
Plaintiff:
Marcus Dieter Felder
Defendant:
GEO Group, Maria Richard and Leroy Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Milstead v. General Motors LLC et al
as 4:2021cv06338
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Pereda, Donald Roxberry, Bruce Heise and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, General Motors Holdings LLC and General Motors Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Fleischhauer et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2021cv05971
Plaintiff:
Dieter Fleischhauer and Susan Lynn Fleischhauer
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dieter Hartmann v. Tyler Bates et al
as 2:2019cv05273
Plaintiff:
Dieter Hartmann
Defendant:
Tyler Bates Music, Inc., Tyler Bates, Focus Features, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Dieter Hartmann v. Tyler Bates et al
as 2:2018cv08863
Plaintiff:
Dieter Hartmann
Defendant:
Tyler Bates Music, Inc., Tyler Bates, Focus Features Productions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Elena Baturina v. Eieter Abt
as 2:2018cv05886
Petitioner:
Elena Baturina
Respondent:
Dieter Abt
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Kelsey M. Dieter et al v. CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC, et al
as 5:2016cv02448
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Kelsey M. Dieter and George Henry Dieter III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
