Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Chapman v. Karp
as 23-923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant / Appellee:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Chapman v. Karp et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Travon Freeman v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 19-16990
Defendant / Appellee:
B. RULLER, SCC, J. ABERNATHY, Appeals Analyst, SCOTT KERNAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRAVON LEON FREEMAN
Freeman v. Kernan et al
as 2:2017cv02233
Plaintiff:
Travon Leon Freeman
Defendant:
Scott Kernan, Sandra Alfaro, David Baughman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cazeau v. Difede et al
as 1:2017cv02294
Plaintiff:
Winshey Cazeau
Defendant:
P.O. Michael Difede, John Doe 1 through 10, Sergeant Timothy Glant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Creative Entertainment, LLC et al
as 8:2013cv01722
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Creative Entertainment, LLC, Difede & Associates 003, LLC, K5 Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Creative Entertainment, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00626
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Creative Entertainment, LLC , Difede & Associates 003, LLC , K5 Partners, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Federal Communications Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
