Cases 1 - 10 of 18
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA v. PAGE et al
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
SAMUEL SCOTT PAGE and ROCKINGHAM COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA v. RUMMAGE
as 1:2021cv00220
Defendant:
ROBBY RUMMAGE
Plaintiff:
DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA
Yasmin Reyazuddin v. Montgomery County, Maryland
as 19-2144
Defendant / Appellee:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MARYLAND
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YASMIN REYAZUDDIN
Amicus Curiae:
DISABILITY LAW CENTER FOR VIRGINIA, DISABILITY RIGHTS OF WEST VIRGINIA, DISABILITY RIGHTS NORTH CAROLINA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00994
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disability Rights North Carolina v. McDowell County Board of Education et al
as 1:2018cv00195
Defendant:
McDowell County Board of Education and Glenda Starr
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disability Rights North Carolina v. Payne
as 5:2017cv00216
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights North Carolina
Defendant:
Mark Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disability Rights North Carolina v. Brajer
as 5:2016cv00854
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights North Carolina
Defendant:
Richard Brajer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disability Rights North Carolina v. Brajer
as 1:2016cv00137
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights North Carolina
Defendant:
Richard Brajer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disability Rights North Carolina v. Brajer
as 5:2016cv00072
Plaintiff:
Disability Rights North Carolina
Defendant:
Richard Brajer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
