Cases 1 - 10 of 467
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Langworthy v. Clallam County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2976
Plaintiff:
GENEVA LANGWORTHY
Defendant:
CLALLAM COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, ALEX SCHODOWSKI, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge, DAVE NEUPERT, Clallam County District Court Judge and Pro Tem Judge and others
Ayala v. NYC Human Resources Administration
as 24-1196
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN AYALA
Defendant:
NYC HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION, JAMIE ESPARZA, EL PASO DISTRICT ATTORNEY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6078
Plaintiff:
MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Rickey Benson v. Sheryl Lipman
as 24-5381
Plaintiff:
RICKEY BENSON
Defendant:
SHERYL H. LIPMAN, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
Bibb v. The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
as 2:2024cv01808
Plaintiff:
Ronald D Bibb
Defendant:
The U.S. District Court Judge Edmund J. Sargus's Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal
Vanbuskirk v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6070
Plaintiff:
AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6069
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant:
STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
