Cases 1 - 9 of 9
BURNHAM v. MORGAN et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
DILLIAN BURNHAM
Defendant:
ANDREW MORGAN, ETHAN WHITNEY, FRANKLIN DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
FLOYD v. WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
SEAN J FLOYD
Defendant:
WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DARRIN MOODY, DANIEL PEREZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FLOYD v. WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
SEAN J FLOYD
Defendant:
WALDO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CODY LAITE, CASEY ASHEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WITHAM v. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 1:2023cv00261
Plaintiff:
JEFF WITHAM
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE and ANIMAL CONTROL
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PLOURDE v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2020cv00149
Defendant:
DICK HARTLEY, WILLIAM ANDERSON, CHARLES BUDD and others
Plaintiff:
GLEN PLOURDE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
INMAN v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE DA CHRIS ALMY
as 1:2017cv00412
Petitioner:
FRANK INMAN
Respondent:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE DA CHRIS ALMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUTCHINS v. SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK et al
as 1:2016cv00280
Plaintiff:
BONNY LOU BUZZELL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
SKOWHEGAN SAVING BANK, ADAM & EVE HAIRCARE, COMMUNITY CRISIS COUNSELING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. GRIFFIN et al
as 2:2010cv00406
Plaintiff:
DONALD A WHITE
Defendant:
MATHEW GRIFFIN, MAINE STATE POLICE, ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GORDON v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2008cv00100
Plaintiff:
PETER LEWIS GORDON
Defendant:
STATE OF MAINE , SOMERSET SUPERIOR COURT , SOMERSET COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
