Other Statutory Actions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Radbil et al v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv01082
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Helene Radbil and Richard Radbil
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Westberg v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01187
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Bernard Westberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Silverman v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00504
Plaintiff: Ruth Silverman
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services, Inc. and Lynn Beck
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Fields v. Diversified Collection Services Inc
as 2:2012cv00526
Plaintiff: David Fields
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lindeman v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00456
Plaintiff: Gary Lindeman
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Desalvo v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
as 5:2012cv00717
Plaintiff: Theodore Desalvo
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Worrell v. Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
as 1:2011cv06177
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Vanessa Worrell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dee v. Diversified Collection Services Inc
as 2:2011cv00450
Plaintiff: Debra Dee
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Flores v. Diversified Collection Services Inc
as 1:2011cv08592
Plaintiff: Roxanne Flores
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Szymanski v. Diversified Collection Services Inc.
as 1:2011cv08135
Defendant: Diversified Collection Services Inc.
Plaintiff: Krystyna Szymanski
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?