Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10704
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, MRF, FNU Montgomery and others
Evans v. Chapman et al
as 4:2023cv10263
Plaintiff:
Alrelio L. Evans
Defendant:
Willie Chapman, Kristopher Steece, Vann and others
Brown #367927 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00541
Plaintiff:
Antrell Vonicque Brown #367927 and Islamic Ali
Defendant:
Unknown Part(y)(ies) #3, Unknown Elbodi, Michigan, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. State of Michigan et al
as 5:2021cv10531
Defendant:
Deputy Wardens, Business Office, Classification Directors and others
Plaintiff:
Antrell V. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cole et al v. Snyder et al
as 5:2019cv12709
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Daugherty Johnson, Gerald Ambrose and others
Plaintiff:
Randell Kelley, Denise Cooper Sawyers, Rebecca Deacons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dobbins v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 2:2019cv10546
Plaintiff:
Trivly Dobbins
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Ann Arbor Public Schools et al
as 2:2011cv15657
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Ann Arbor Public Schools , Olumide Osuntuyi, Estate of Kelvin R., Dobbins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dobbins #321402 v. Woods
as 2:2009cv00210
Petitioner:
Keith Dobbins #321402
Respondent:
Jeffrey Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dobbins #321402 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2009cv00185
Plaintiff:
Keith Dobbins #321402
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Marilyn Kelly, Alton T. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dobbins #321402 v. Craycraft
as 2:2008cv00290
Plaintiff:
Keith Dobbins #321402
Defendant:
George Craycraft
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
