Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sashinger v. Renown Medical Staff et al
as 3:2019cv00734
Defendant:
Renown Medical Staff, Washoe County Detention Facility, W.C.D.F. Staff and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal M Sashinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chilcote v. Marion County Jail et al
as 6:2016cv02042
Defendant:
Deputy (A252), Deputy (A284), Deputy Sgt. K. Abraham and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gene Chilcote
A14:
Deputy Lt. Cox
A207:
Deputy Dunbar
A317:
Deputy Frieze
829), (826), (839:
Medical Staff
A27:
Sgt. Peterson
A253:
Deputy White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward Lynn Bryant v. Doctor 1 et al
as 2:2014cv02467
Plaintiff:
Edward Lynn Bryant
Defendant:
CMO 1, Doctor 1 and Doctor 2
Miriam Mendiola-Martinez v. Joseph Arpaio, et al
as 14-15189
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MIRIAM MENDIOLA-MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH M. ARPAIO, Maricopa County Sheriff, UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as: Jane Doe Officers 1-5, John Doe Officers 1-5, Jane Doe Doctors 1-5, John Doe Doctors 1-5, Jane Doe Nurses 1-5, and John Doe Nurses 1-5 (in their individual capacities), COUNTY OF MARICOPA, as named in amended complaint and others
Rosalez v. Auburn Regional Medical Center Inc et al
as 2:2009cv01217
Plaintiff:
Martina Rosalez
Defendant:
Auburn Regional Medical Center Inc, Universal Health Services Inc, Kenneth D Baker, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Rosalez v. Auburn Regional Medical Center Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00936
Plaintiff:
Martina Rosalez
Defendant:
Auburn Regional Medical Center Inc, Universal Health Services Inc, Kenneth D Baker, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rosalez v. Auburn Regional Medical Center Inc et al
as 2:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
Martina Rosalez
Defendant:
Auburn Regional Medical Center Inc, Universal Health Services Inc, Kenneth D Baker, MD and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
