Cases 1 - 9 of 9
JENKINS v. ARMSTRONG COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
JANET L JENKINS
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG COUNTY, Warden PHILLIP SHAFFER, Doctor JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Happle v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Thomas-Martin Happle
Defendant:
Kathleen Wilson, Doctor John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv05242
Plaintiff:
Washington Davis
Defendant:
Cleveland, Gary Schmansky, Hon. Carol R. Edmead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
DAVIS v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al
as 5:2021cv00188
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON DAVIS
Defendant:
CLEVELAND, GARY SCHMANSKY, GOVERNOR CUOMO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Smith-Gilliam et al
as 1:2019cv05212
Defendant:
Shealane Smith-Gilliam, Doctor John Doe and John Doe(s)
Plaintiff:
Curtis Arnold
WALLACE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00257
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER JOHNSON, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FROSTER, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
CARZELL WALLACE, JR. and CARZELL WALLACE JUNIOR,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of Clayton Lockett v. Gov. Mary Fallin, et al
as 15-6134
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THE ESTATE OF CLAYTON LOCKETT, by and through its personal representative Gary Lockett
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR MARY FALLIN, in her individual capacity, ROBERT C. PATTON, in his individual capacity, ANITA TRAMMELL, in her individual capacity and others
RASUK v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv03598
Plaintiff:
RUIZDAEEL RASUK
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JUANITA GOODMAN, BRUCE HERDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Sandiford v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv03882
Defendant:
Doctor John Doe, Detective Alan Kalisky and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Toni Sandiford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
