Cases 21 - 30 of 69
Hodge v. Doe (1) et al
as 3:2019cv01573
Defendant:
John Doe (1), John Doe (6), Jane Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Hodge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01942
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 16-18, JOHN DOE 1-3, JOHN DOE 10-12 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALLEN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv01066
Defendant:
DREW RICE, MICHAEL REPICI, JOSEPH MEARS and others
Plaintiff:
BAKEER ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Larson et al
as 3:2017cv02341
Plaintiff:
Joel Perez
Defendant:
James J. Larson, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUISEPPE v. MCFADDEN et al
as 2:2017cv04880
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL GUISEPPE
Defendant:
MCFADDEN , REED , JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2017cv01591
Plaintiff:
Anthony Phillips
Defendant:
Kerestes, Beggs, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2016cv03426
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. EVANS
Defendant:
MERCY SUBURBAN HOSPITAL, TOWNE MANOR EAST NURSING HOME & REHABILITATION CENTER, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabrera v. Clark et al
as 1:2016cv00392
Plaintiff:
Jose Emmanuel Ortiz Cabrera
Defendant:
Michael Smith, Jane Doe, Jane Doe (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KOKINDA v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2015cv01593
Plaintiff:
JASON KOKINDA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, MICHELE HOWARD DIGGS, CHRISTOPHER H. OPPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WERKMEISTER et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2015cv01069
Plaintiff:
TABATHA WERKMEISTER and GRINAGE DION WILSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, REGINA MCDONALD, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
