Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Williams v. Keen et al
as 4:2021cv00534
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo J. Williams
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 3, Daniel Keen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00172
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Dewalt v. Brauner et al
as 4:2019cv00046
Defendant:
Adam Randazzo, John Doe #5, Unknown Eckhoff and others
Plaintiff:
Roderick Dewalt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. Willoughby et al
as 1:2016cv00160
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Schmidt
Defendant:
Robert Willoughby , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Boyer
as 4:2013cv01407
Plaintiff:
Orlando Jones
Defendant:
Oliver Glenn Boyer, Officers John Does 1-6, Prob. Officer Jane Doe #7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Missouri Department of Corrections, et al
as 1:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Angel King
Defendant:
Terry Russell, Scott McFarland, Missouri Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2011cv00107
Plaintiff:
Joyce Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Larry Crawford, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Williams v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2011cv01092
Plaintiff:
Joyce Williams
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, Larry Crawford, Southeast Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Bishop v. Dunn et al
as 1:2011cv00012
Plaintiff:
Charles H. Bishop
Defendant:
Charlana Dunn, John Doe #6, John Doe #7 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riley et al v. Randolph County et al
as 2:2011cv00006
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Riley, Sr. and Georgia A. Riley
Defendant:
Randolph County , Mark Nichols , Bobbie Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
