Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Kubinski v. Edwards, et al
as 6:2021cv00059
Defendant:
Rodney Prince, John Does 1-10, Armor Correctional Health Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leo Kubinski, The Estate of Richard Paul Kubinski and Lorraine Kubinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. INCH et al
as 4:2020cv00214
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 19, JOHN DOE 21, BRIAN LEACH and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE RICHARD MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOWLER v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 5:2020cv00171
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE 1, CAPTAIN DAVIS, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LEWIS FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ives v. Reddish et al
as 3:2019cv00827
Defendant:
Thompson, John Doe #5, John Doe #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick W. Ives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BATTLE v. INCH et al
as 3:2019cv02068
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, RICHARDSON, JOHN DOE #0 and others
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIUS LEE BATTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOUIS DEL FAVERO ORCHIDS INC v. RIVKEES et al
as 4:2019cv00284
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #5, Christian Bax, JOHN DOE #4 and others
Plaintiff:
Louis Del Favero Orchids, Inc. and LOUIS DEL FAVERO ORCHIDS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Borroto v. Lees et al
as 6:2019cv00851
Defendant:
John Doe 9, Peter Crank, Lees Eid and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Armas Borroto, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borchers v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv61537
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Does 111-120, Does 21-30 and others
Plaintiff:
Donald P. Borchers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
DIRECTV, LLC v. MK Hospitality, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02563
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
MK Hospitality, Inc., Comptra, Inc., Manish Karamshi and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
SMITH v. VAN et al
as 4:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
JAMES V SMITH, JR
Defendant:
ADAM VAN, BAILEY, MISTY L HOWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
