Cases 1 - 7 of 7
The Naughtys LLC v. Does 1-580
as 4:2021cv00492
Plaintiff:
The Naughtys LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-580, Doe 299, Doe 159 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Merrell, v. Does 1-417, As Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2021cv01316
Plaintiff:
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 and Galen Merrell
Defendant:
Does 1-417, As Identified in Exhibit 2, Doe 295 Mantina, Doe 268 rainbowonline2012 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 v. Does 1-727
as 1:2021cv00440
Defendant:
Does 1-727, Doe 13 Viviant, Doe 319 sahid_58 and others
Plaintiff:
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 and Stussy, Inc.
Cross Defendant:
Doe 7 Stussyboy
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Nowstalgic Toys, Inc. vs. Yiwu Huating Imp & Exp Co., Ltd.
as 1:2020cv05003
Defendant:
Does 1-340, As Identified in Exhibit 2, Doe 212 nackers15, Doe 94 FUNNYBABY Store and others
Plaintiff:
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Nautilus Insurance Corporation v. Mount Bachelor Educational Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00825
Defendant:
Aspen Education Group, Inc., BPO, CRC Health Group, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nautilus Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
DIGITAL SIN INC v. DOES 1-208
as 4:2011cv00583
Plaintiff:
DIGITAL SIN INC
Defendant:
DOES 1-208, Doe #58 , John Doe 164 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Father Doe 112 et al v. Montgomery-Lonsdale Public Schools ISD No. 394 et al
as 0:2008cv00621
Plaintiff:
Father Doe 112, Father Doe 112, Mother Doe 112 and others
Defendant:
Montgomery-Lonsdale Public Schools ISD No. 394, Montgomery-Lonsdale Public Schools ISD No. 394 and Troy Bernard
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Montgomery-Lonsdale Public Schools ISD No. 394 and Montgomery-Lonsdale Public Schools ISD No. 394
ThirdParty Defendant:
Mother Doe 112 and Mother Doe 112
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Sex/Blindness Discrimination in Educational Programs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
