Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Farley et al v. Potter et al (TV2)
as 3:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Chad Farley and Jessica Farley
Defendant:
Wayne Potter, Teddy Bales, Lonnie Larue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOE 12 et al v. Eastern Michigan University Board of Regents et al
as 2:2021cv11225
Defendant:
Delta Tau Delta, INC., THETA CHI FRATERNITY, INC., SIGMA KAPPA, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 19, JANE DOE 17, JANE DOE 15 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John and Jane Doe 1, et al. v. Springboro Community City School District et al
as 1:2019cv00785
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1-12, John and Jane Doe 4, John and Jane Doe 7 and others
Defendant:
John Austin Hopkins, Carrie Corder, Daniel Schroer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Klein v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2017cv00219
Plaintiff:
John Klein
Defendant:
Hamilton County, NaphCare, Inc, Jim Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maria Muniz-Muniz, et al v. United States Border Patrol, et al
as 16-3400
Plaintiff:
MARIA MUNIZ-MUNIZ, ROBERTO MUNIZ, ANTONIO TORRES-FRANCO and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OHIO IMMIGRANT WORKER PROJECT and FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE, AFL-CIO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BORDER PATROL, Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security, JOHN DOES 19-21, individually and in their official capacities as Norwalk Ohio Police Department officers and JOHN DOES 1-9, in their capacity as United States Border Patrol Agents assigned or working from the Sandusky, Ohio Border Patrol Station
Defendant:
RANDY GALLEGOS, JOHN DOES 1-15, individually and in their capacity as United States Border Patrol Agents assigned or working from the Sandusky, Ohio United States Border Patrol Station, BRADLEY SHAVER and others
Spratt v. City of Cleveland et al
as 1:2008cv02237
Plaintiff:
Namir Spratt and Namir Spratt
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, John Does 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6, City of Warrensville Heights and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
