Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Barber v. Revive Organics, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03124
Plaintiff:
Toni Barber
Defendant:
Revive Organics, Inc. doing business as Revive Superfoods, Miski Organics Superfoods, Inc. and John Doe Importers and Suppliers 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barber v. Revive Organics, Inc.
as 0:2023cv05665
Plaintiff:
Toni Barber
Defendant:
Revive Organics, Inc. doing business as Revive Superfoods, Miski Organics Superfoods, Inc. and John Doe Importers and Suppliers 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bray v. Charles Ninneman and Colene Ninneman
as 4:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
John Bray
Defendant:
Charles Ninneman and Colene Ninneman d/b/aImpact Fireworks, Charles Ninneman and Colene Ninneman doing business as Impact Fireworks and John Doe Importer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
-RNB Lilian S Ileto, et al v. Glock Inc, et al
as 2:2001cv09762
Defendant:
Bushmaster Firearms, China North Industries Corp, Jimmy L Davis and others
Unknown:
Daniel K Dik, Koji F Fukumura, Colin H Murray and others
Plaintiff:
Mindy Gale Finkelstein, Lilian S Ileto, Benjamin Kadish and others
Movant:
RSR Management Corp and RSR Wholesale Guns Seattle Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Wilson et al v. Robinson et al
as 1:2007cv02977
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Wilson and Brenda Wilson
Defendant:
Metabo Corporation, John Doe Importer, Inc. and John Doe Manufacturer
Cross Defendant:
John Doe Importer, Inc. and John Doe Manufacturer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Wilson et al v. Robinson et al
as 1:2007cv00872
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Wilson, Thomas J Wilson, Brenda Wilson and others
Defendant:
James Robinson, Metabo Corporation, John Doe Importer, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
