Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Griffin-Jones v. City of San Diego et al
as 3:2021cv00024
Plaintiff:
Christina Griffin-Jones
Defendant:
J. Doe Nos. 1-25 and City of San Diego
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Vuz v. DCSS III, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00246
Defendant:
DCSS III, Inc., County of San Diego, Matthew Zadja and others
Plaintiff:
Ashley R. Vuz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Santana et al v. City of Sunnyside, Sunnyside Police Department et al
as 1:2017cv03133
Plaintiff:
Noel A Santana , Jose G Santana , Ana M Santana and others
Defendant:
City of Sunnyside, Sunnyside Police Department , Al Escalera , C Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. City of Granger et al
as 1:2016cv03202
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Vargas
Defendant:
City of Granger, Robert Perales and John Does Nos. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cisneros v. City of Sunnyside et al
as 1:2016cv03009
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Cisneros
Defendant:
City of Sunnyside, County of Yakima, Jaime Prieto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartfield v. Oregon State Bar et al
as 3:2016cv00068
Defendant:
J. Doe Nos.1-10 and Oregon State Bar
Plaintiff:
Sean L. Hartfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Langdon Family Revocable Trust v. City of Yakima et al
as 1:2015cv03127
Trustee:
Daniel W Langdon
Plaintiff:
Langdon Family Revocable Trust
Defendant:
City of Yakima, County of Yakima, Yakima Air Terminal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2014cv05833
Plaintiff:
Peggy Johnson
Defendant:
Mason County, Tom Haugen and JOHN DOES NOS. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv01606
Defendant:
JOHN DOES NOS. 1-5, Mason County and Tom Haugen
Plaintiff:
Peggy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2014cv01603
Plaintiff:
Peggy Johnson
Defendant:
Mason County, Tom Haugen and JOHN DOES NOS. 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
