Cases 41 - 50 of 197
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY et al v. BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC. et al
as 5:2019cv04846
Plaintiff:
FAIRFAX COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY, CITY OF RICHMOND, COUNTY OF CHESTERFIELD and others
Defendant:
JOHN DOE NOS. 1-50 and BRENNTAG NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Direct RX Pharmacy Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05876
Defendant:
Rafo Yaguda, Rafael Antonio Delacruz-Gomez, M.D., Robert Yakutilov and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sonterra Capital Master Fund L v. Credit Suisse Group AG
as 19-3367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FrontPoint Healthcare Flagship Enhanced Fund, L.P., Hunter Global Investors SRI Fund, Ltd., Sonterra Capital Master Fund Ltd., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Tullett Prebon (Europe) Limited, ICAP Securities USA LLC., ICAP Europe Limited and others
Defendant:
Bluecrest Capital Management LLP and JPMorgan Chase & Co.
FrontPoint Asian Event Driven v. Citibank, N.A.
as 19-2719
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Fund Liquidation Holdings LLC, as assignee and successor-in-interest to FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund L.P., on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated,
Defendant:
John Does, Nos. 1-50, Citibank, N.A., Citigroup Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DBS Bank Ltd., UBS AG, BNP Paribas Securities Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, L.P., Sonterra Capital Master Fund, LTD. and FrontPoint Asian Event Driven Fund, Ltd.
Clune v. Barry, Jr.
as 19-2466
Respondent:
Winged Foot Golf Club, Inc., John D. Gillespie, as executor of the estate of George J. Gillespie, III, John Does, Nos. 1-10 and others
Petitioner:
Kevin P. Clune, As Executor of the Estate of Barbara B. Clune, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and James E. Fisher, Indivdually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Government Employees Insurance Company et al v. Wellmart RX, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv04414
Defendant:
Ruslan Nektalov, Denny Rodriguez, M.D., Viviane Etienne, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
GEICO Indemnity Company, GEICO Casualty Company, GEICO General Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robert Charles Class A, L.P. et al v. Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06172
Defendant:
John Does Nos. 1-10, Bank of America Corporation, Edward Bases and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Teel and Robert Charles Class A, L.P.
Not Yet Classified:
Abraham Jeremias, Morris Jeremias, Gamma Traders - I LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 1
Gama Traders - I LLC et al v. Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06002
Defendant:
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Bank Of America Corporation, Edward Bases and others
Plaintiff:
Gama Traders - I LLC, Vega Traders LLC and Gamma Traders - I LLC
Not Yet Classified:
Abraham Jeremias, Morris Jeremias and Yuri Alishaev
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 1
Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston et al v. USALCO, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv12197
Plaintiff:
Commission of Public Works of the City of Greenville SC, Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston, City of Winston-Salem and others
Defendant:
Delta Chemical Corporation, USALCO LLC, John Doe Nos. 1 - 50 and others
In Re:
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston et al v. USALCO, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv12197
Plaintiff:
Commission of Public Works of the City of Greenville SC, Commissioners of Public Works of the City of Charleston, City of Winston-Salem and others
Defendant:
Delta Chemical Corporation, USALCO LLC, John Doe Nos. 1 - 50 and others
In Re:
LIQUID ALUMINUM SULFATE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
