Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Doe et al v. Huff et al
as 3:2015cv05052
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe , Doechild I and Doechild II
Defendant:
C. J. Huff and Brandon Eggleston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freedom From Religion Foundati, et al v. Hanover School District, et al
as 09-2473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION, PAT DOE, Parent and Next Friend of Doechild-1, Doechild-2 and Doechild-3 and JAN DOE, Parent and Next Friend of Doechild-1, Doechild-2 and Doechild-3 other Doechild-1 other Doechild-2 other Doechild-3
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES, STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, MURIEL CYRUS and others
Defendant:
SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE UNIT 70, US CONGRESS, DRESDEN SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Interested Party:
CORNERSTONE POLICY RESEARCH, ALLIANCE DEFENSE FUND and AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE
:
, , and others
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc. et al v. Cherry Creek School District et al
as 1:2007cv02126
Plaintiff:
Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc., John Doe, DoeChild and others
Defendant:
Cherry Creek School District and Monte C. Moses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newdow, et al v. Rio Linda Union School Dist., et al
as 05-17257
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL NEWDOW, PAT DOE, DOECHILD and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAN ROE and ROECHILD-2
Defendant - Appellant:
RIO LINDA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, SACRAMENTO CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN CAREY, ADRIENNE CAREY and others
Amicus Curiae:
PACIFIC JUSTICE, THE AMERICAN LEGION, TEXAS, IDAHO, OKLAHMOMA, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARIZONA, ARKANSAS, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, KANSAS, KENTUCKY, LOUISIANA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSISSIPPI, MIS and others
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
EAGLE FORUM EDUCATION AND LEGAL DEFENSE FUND
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
