Cases 41 - 50 of 4,258
Lee v. Wellpath Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Brandi Lee
Defendant:
Wellpath Corporation, Correct Care Solutions, Hayes, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shaya v. Nofs et al
as 2:2024cv10670
Plaintiff:
Stephen B. Shaya
Defendant:
Kylie Nofs, Zhu Shicai, Luo Yanbing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Ryan v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2024cv10672
Plaintiff:
Sean Ryan and Sean Michael Ryan
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Bureau of Health Care Services, Heidi Washington and others
Profit v. Rasmussen et al
as 2:2024cv10654
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bernard Profit
Defendant:
Rasmussen, Johnson, Burgess and others
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al
as 2:2024mc50259
Defendant:
STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Keith Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Letitia James, People of the State of New York and others
Williams v. Continental Aktiengesellschaft et al
as 2:2024cv10632
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Williams
Defendant:
Continental Aktiengesellschaft, Continental Tire the Americas, LLC, Compagne Generale Des Etablissements Michelin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Wolfenbarger v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10616
Plaintiff:
John Thomas Wolfenbarger
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Bryan Morrison, Troy Chrisman and others
Henry v. Parr-Mirza et al
as 2:2024cv10595
Plaintiff:
Arnold V Henry
Defendant:
Parr-Mirza, B. Schaschko, Angela Joseph and others
Mixon et al v. Dearborn Heights, City of, et al
as 4:2024cv10578
Plaintiff:
Shacorra Mixon, AS 2 and AS 1
Defendant:
City of Dearborn Heights, Michael Guzowski, Tim Ciochon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Matsey v. Troy, City of et al
as 4:2024cv10571
Plaintiff:
Melvin Matsey
Defendant:
Troy, City of and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
