Cases 1 - 10 of 17
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, ERTLE, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. OFFICERS DOE #1-5
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
ANGELA ROBINSON
Defendant:
OFFICERS DOE #1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SCHMITT v. DOE 1-6 et al
as 3:2021cv00051
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2, AMY BRADY, KATRINA SANDERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ROSS SCHMITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUNDEN v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00107
Defendant:
RANDALL PURCELL, RUSSELL, ANDREA STROUP and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH MUNDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERSCHEL v. WATTS et al
as 1:2017cv02828
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY SHERIFF, DOES 1-5, ERIC SMALL and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES HERSCHEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SOUTHERN INDIANA TIRE INC. et al v. EADEN et al
as 3:2016cv00081
Defendant:
JOSHUA W. EADEN, J & J TIRE AND SERVICE LLC, JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
SOUTHERN INDIANA TIRE INC.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
MUNDORF v. GUIDIVILLE RANCHERIA OF CALIFORNIA et al
as 1:2015cv01125
Defendant:
JOEY CAPO, MICHAEL DERRY, DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
SARA MUNDORF
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
HENDRICK v. CLARK COUNTY et al
as 4:2015cv00045
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D. HENDRICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HALL v. SAMUELS et al
as 2:2014cv00348
Defendant:
D. ALLRED, BOND HOLDERS/ISSUERS DOES 1-5, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Plaintiff:
MARC PIERRE HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
