Cases 21 - 30 of 103
G. et al v. Township et al
as 5:2020cv03378
Plaintiff:
C. T., T. G., A. M. and others
Defendant:
Kristal Narkiewicz, Manheim Township and John/Jane Does #1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rowe v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2020cv00508
Plaintiff:
John W. Rowe
Defendant:
John Does 1 - 50 and Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRYOR et al v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv01463
Plaintiff:
JOHN PRYOR and DEBORAH PRYOR
Defendant:
MONSANTO COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BORDNER et al v. MONSANTO COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv00186
Plaintiff:
KAREN BORDNER, DENNIS MAURER and RITA LIVESAY
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50 and MONSANTO COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KOVALEV v. STEPANSKY, DMD et al
as 2:2019cv05579
Respondent:
JOHN DOE I, IRINA STEPANSKY, DMD and JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-50
Petitioner:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lough v. County of Columbia et al
as 3:2019cv01697
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Nye, John & Jane Does (1 - 50), Lt. Setzer and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Lough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EYAJAN v. UPMC FOR YOU et al
as 1:2019cv00280
Defendant:
UPMC HAMOT HOSPITAL, DR. CHANDLER CHRISTINE, UPMC EAST HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA M. EYAJAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COVINGTON v. BUCKS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2019cv03062
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAWS, ANTHONY DISANDRO, LIEUTENANT ROBERT GORMAN and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES COVINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01968
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
United States of America v. Beam et al
as 1:2018cv02108
Defendant:
Zak Huth, John R. Holty, Mike Pierce and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
