Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Krekelberg v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2013cv03562
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Krekelberg
Defendant:
Anoka County, City of Anoka , City of Apple Valley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-2920
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mitchell v. Aitkin County et al
as 0:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Dawn Mitchell
Defendant:
Aitkin County , City of Aitkin , Anoka County and others
Potocnik v. Carlson, et al
as 0:2013cv02093
Plaintiff:
Sheila Potocnik
Defendant:
Walter Carlson, Anoka, City of, Bloomington, City of and others
Loeffler v. Anoka, City of et al
as 0:2013cv02060
Plaintiff:
Jennie Marie Loeffler
Defendant:
Anoka, City of , Burnsville, City of , Dakota County and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2671
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Linda Robben v. MO Dept. of Social Services, et al
as 12-1561
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Linda Robben, Maternal Grandmother, Intervenor, Minor Children V.F. and A.M.
Defendant - Appellee:
Missouri Department of Social Services, Childrens Division, Missouri Alliance Permanency Program, Frankie Crouppen Thiel, Great Circle Case Worker and others
Robben v. Missouri Department of Social Services, Childrens Division et al
as 4:2012cv00389
Plaintiff:
Linda Robben
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Social Services, Childrens Division, Missouri Alliance Permanency Program, Frankie Crouppen Thiel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conn v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2012cv00075
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Jane Does 1-50, John Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Coty Conn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00192
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
