Cases 1 - 10 of 190
Cote v. State of Rhode Island et al
as 1:2024cv00075
Defendant:
State of Rhode Island, Chief Justice Paul A. Suttell, in his official capacity, Julie Hamel, in her Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas R. Cote
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Torres-Roman et al v. Martinez-Ocasio et al
as 3:2021cv01621
Plaintiff:
Pedro E Torres Roman, Mario Resende Gonzalez, Antonio Moll and others
Defendant:
Benito A Martinez Ocasio, Rimas Entertainment LLC, 200 Carritos LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Hartunian v. Sweeney et al
as 3:2021cv30089
Plaintiff:
Papken Hartunian
Defendant:
Constance M. Sweeney, Karen L. Goodwin, Mercy Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laccinole v. Navient Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00045
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 Inclusive, Navient Solutions, LLC and John M Kane
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12390
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12174
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv12173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McNeill v. National Grid USA Service Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv12139
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, inclusive and National Grid USA Service Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bryan McNeill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Laccinole v. Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00473
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
DOES 1-10 Inclusive and Moneygram Payment Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
