Cases 1 - 10 of 61
Baptiste v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
Eric Jean Baptiste
Defendant:
City of New York and John Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Azzarmi v. Port Authority of NY & NJ et al
as 1:2023cv07553
Plaintiff:
Aasir Azzarmi
Defendant:
Port Authority of NY & NJ, Philip Tysowski, Dewan Maharaj and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Azzarmi v. Port Authority of NY & NJ et al
as 1:2023cv06640
Plaintiff:
Aasir Azzarmi
Defendant:
Port Authority of NY & NJ, Philip Tysowski, Dewan Maharaj and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosa v. Hoke et al
as 9:2023cv00573
Plaintiff:
Juan Rosa
Defendant:
Officer Hoke, John Does 1-9 and Sergeant E. Velie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson, Jr. v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeffrey Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
County of Nassau, Nassau County Correctional Center, Nassau County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Leifer v. John Does 1-9
as 1:2022cv01770
Plaintiff:
Shulim Leifer
Defendant:
John Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Miller, M.D. v. Crystal Run Health Care Physicians, LLP et al
as 7:2021cv08114
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller, M.D.
Defendant:
Crystal Run Health Care Physicians, LLP et al, Crystal Run Health Care Physicians, LLP, John/Jane Doe 1-9 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11101
Voe v. Doe 1-9
as 1:2020cv05737
Defendant:
John Doe 1-9
Plaintiff:
Victor Voe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Voe v. Does 1-9
as 2:2020cv05737
Plaintiff:
Victor Voe
Defendant:
John Does 1-9
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Arco v. Reason, Logic & Law et al
as 1:2020cv08726
Defendant:
Chief Maestro Chaven, RTSMediaink P. Grant, CCLN J. Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
The People Johnny Arco and The People doing business as Johnny Arco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
