Cases 31 - 40 of 430
Vanhouwe v. Northampton County et al
as 5:2022cv01408
Plaintiff:
Brittany Vanhouwe
Defendant:
Northampton County, Kelvin Myers, Allison Rippert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RIHL v. TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2022cv01756
Plaintiff:
Mya Rihl and AMY RIHL
Defendant:
TRANSAMERICA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOES (I-X)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALCANTARA v. WALMART SUPERCENTER et al
as 2:2022cv00850
Plaintiff:
ZULEMA ALCANTARA
Defendant:
WALMART SUPERCENTER, JOHN DOE I-X and ABC CORP I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ZINGALE v. TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS et al
as 2:2022cv00760
Plaintiff:
DOMENICK J ZINGALE
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF LITTLE FALLS, LITTLE FALLS POLICE DEPARTMENT, LOUIS RACANELLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GERVINO v. SHELL GAS STATION et al
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GERVINO
Defendant:
SHELL GAS STATION, JOHN DOE I-X and ABC CORP. I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
AKKAS v. STARBUCKS COFFEE et al
as 2:2021cv20359
Plaintiff:
ERDAL AKKAS
Defendant:
STARBUCKS COFFEE, JOHN DOE I-X and ABC CORP. I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TRENOSKY et al v. STOP & SHOP 100853 et al
as 2:2021cv19516
Plaintiff:
LILIANA TRENOSKY and AGUSTIN TRENOSKY
Defendant:
STOP & SHOP 100853, JOHN DOE (I-X) and ABC CORP. (I-X)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUGHES et al v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv19352
Plaintiff:
LEONA HUGHES and JOHN HUGHES
Defendant:
WALMART, INC., ABC CORPORATION(S) I-X and JOHN DOES I-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv18191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
