Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Morgan v. Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Gary Don Morgan
Defendant:
Harry Johnson and Marcus Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morgan v. Johnson et al
as 4:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Gary Don Morgan
Defendant:
Harry Johnson and Marcus Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction et al
as 1:2014cv00935
Plaintiff:
Gerald Thompson
Defendant:
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility, Don Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Dixon v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 13-3544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DIXON
Defendant:
O.D.C. GARY MOHR, et al.
Defendant - Appellee:
LARRY GREENE, DON MORGAN and MIC OPPY
William Dixon v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 12-3963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, et al., LARRY GREEN, DON MORGAN and others
Peabody Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 12-1978
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARY ELLEN MORGAN, Widow of Don Morgan
Dixon v. Mohr et al
as 1:2012cv00294
Plaintiff:
William Dixon
Defendant:
O.D.C. Gary Mohr, Larry Greene, Don Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua, Jimmie v. Meisner, Michael et al
as 3:2012cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jimmie L. Joshua
Defendant:
Michael Meisner , Janel Nickels , Don Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Morgan et al
as 1:2011cv00380
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Barnes, Jr.
Defendant:
Don Morgan, Mona Parks and R. Clagg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Nevada Department of Public Safety Division of Parole and Probation et al
as 2:2008cv01229
Plaintiff:
Theodore J. Thompson
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Public Safety Division of Parole and Probation, Brian Heard, Don Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
