Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Steven Tucker, et al v. Don Verrett, et al
as 22-16558
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN LEE TUCKER, a married man
Plaintiff:
GAIL TUCKER
Defendant / Appellee:
DON VERRETT, In his individual and official capacity as a senior parole officer at Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, NICOLE STUDER, In her individual and official capacity as a parole manager at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, PAM JENSEN, In her individual and official capacity as aparole supervisor at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center and others
Defendant:
ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NICHOLAS RATKEVICH, In his individual and official capacity as a correctional officer with the Arizona Department of Corrections, at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, MAUREEN RODRIGUEZ, In her individual and official capacity as the Southern Regional IT Manager at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center and others
Ball v. Ryan et al
as 4:2019cv00444
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Executive Clemency, Don Adams, Don Verrett and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Tucker, et al v. ADOC, et al
as 19-15873
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS RATKEVICH, In his individual and official capacity as a correctional officer with the Arizona Department of Corrections, at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, JOHN MARCH, In his individual and official capacity as a parole officer at the Southern Regional Community Corrections Center, RICHARD ZORMEIER, in his individual and official capacity as a an employee of the Arizona Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GAIL TUCKER and STEVEN LEE TUCKER, a married man
Tucker v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
Steven Lee Tucker
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Don Verrett, Nikki Studer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
