Cases 1 - 10 of 808
MAYBERRY v. EMMERSON et al
as 1:2024cv00768
Plaintiff:
JOSH MAYBERRY
Defendant:
DONALD EMMERSON, LPN, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDS v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00745
Petitioner:
RANDALL RICHARDS
Respondent:
DONALD EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Winkler v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Sonya Winkler
Defendant:
David John Harris, Franciscan Alliance, Inc., Donald John Trump and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
STONE v. EMERSON et al
as 2:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
JEREMY STONE
Defendant:
DONALD EMERSON, SNODGRASS, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RUTH-BRADLEY v. SIPICH et al
as 1:2024cv00666
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAMES RUTH-BRADLEY
Defendant:
CARRIE SIPICH, DERRIK HOBBS, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREER v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
DONALD C. GREER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
COE v. BLUME et al
as 2:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Donald Coe
Defendant:
Mark Blume and Hirschbach Motor Line, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
SIGNUM, LLC et al v. INDIANAPOLIS ORGANIC LAWN CARE, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
SIGNUM, LLC and NATURALAWN OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS ORGANIC LAWN CARE, INC., DONALD HARVEY, DEBORAH CASEY-HARVEY and others
JAMES v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
as 3:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JAMES
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT.
Interested Party:
SCOTT SIMMONS, THOMAS MOFFITT, MORGAN FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. HAYDEN
as 3:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
DONALD R. WHITE, JR.
Respondent:
MICHAEL J. HAYDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
