Cases 1 - 10 of 22
MARSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21284
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS MARSH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Denny, II v Woodcrafters Home Products, LLC
as 7:2023cv00140
Plaintiff:
Donald Lewis Denny, II
Defendant:
Woodcrafters Home Products, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17052
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MARSH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv88253
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS MARSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03653
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard
Plaintiff:
Donald Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10541
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LEWIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv57998
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 0:2019cv02046
Plaintiff:
Judy Lewis and Donald Lewis
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Lewis v. Permanent Mission of Cote D'ivoire to The United Nations et al.
as 1:2019cv01375
Defendant:
Permanent Mission of Cote D'ivoire to The United Nations and Diarra Adama
Plaintiff:
Donald Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 au
LEWIS v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP et al
as 2:2018cv00115
Plaintiff:
DONALD LEWIS
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP, PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
