Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Weaver v. Indiana Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2026cv01527
Plaintiff:
Donald Weaver and Donald Edward Weaver, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections, Ron Neal, Dawn Buss and others
Unknown:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strange v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2026cv27279
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward Strange
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strange v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Dade)
as 1:2026cv26116
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward Strange
Respondent:
Secretary Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strange v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Dade)
as 3:2026cv02291
Petitioner:
Donald Edward Strange
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puente v. M.S.A., Inc. et al
as 6:2026cv00382
Plaintiff:
Antonio Puente
Defendant:
M.S.A., Inc., Donald Edward Lee-Grant and Donald Edward Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Trujillo Bransford v. USA
as 1:2026cv02563
Petitioner:
Donald Edward Trujillo Bransford
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
v. wilson et al
as 1:2026cv01433
Defendant:
Donald Edward wilson
Respondent:
Carlos Eduardo Marron
Cause Of Action: Motion to transfer
Donald Edward Wilson
as 1:2026cv01431
Petitioner:
Donald Edward Wilson
Cause Of Action: Application for a Writ of Garnishment
Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2026cv01501
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
