Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Ben Sasse, David Scott, Lisa Murkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Loy Arlan Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Windom v. Brady et al
as 5:2019cv02045
Defendant:
Mitch McConnell, Alan C. Nelson, Dick Cheney and others
Plaintiff:
I & O Publishing Co., Neo-Tech Research Writing Center and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Windom v. Hatch et al
as 3:2018cv07660
Defendant:
Charles E Schumer, Mitch McConnell, Orrin G. Hatch and others
Plaintiff:
Cameron O Windom and Cameron O. Windom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv08393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
BECKER v. HUDSON et al
as 1:2007cv05421
Petitioner:
JAN F. BECKER
Respondent:
HUDSON, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT A. FIATAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Southeast Alaska, et al v. USACE, et al
as 06-35679
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SOUTHEAST ALASKA CONSERVATION COUNCIL, SIERRA CLUB and LYNN CANAL CONSERVATION
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, TIMOTHY J. GALLAGHER, Colonel, in his official capacity as District Engineer, LARRY L. REEDER, in his official capacity of Chief of the Regulatory Branch and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
COEUR ALASKA, INC., GOLDBELT, INC. and STATE OF ALASKA
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN RIVERS, CLEAN WATER ACTION NETWORK, COOK INLETKEEPER and others
ROYANEH et al v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES
as 3:2005cv01617
Defendant:
AL SHARPTON, JEFFREY SPRUILL, DONALD M. PAYNE and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICE ROYANEH and LORD NOBLE WYSDOM EL PHARAZ BIGELOW ALI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
