Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Amesbury v. Sisson et al
as 1:2021cv00409
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury d/b/a Polytechnic
Defendant:
William Sisson, Dave Goldstein, Pawtucket Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2020cv00348
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, J Hanley, David Moran and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2019cv00651
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Michael Polaceck, Melissa C. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2019cv00342
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Michael Polaceck, William D. Vieira, Sr. and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amesbury v. City of Pawtucket et al
as 1:2019cv00082
Defendant:
City of Pawtucket, Donna M Pinto, Donald Grebien and others
Plaintiff:
Mark E. Amesbury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kinder et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00317
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Kinder and Patricia L. Kinder
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Services, Inc. , GMAC Mortgage Corporation and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pagliaro v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems et al
as 1:2011cv00300
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Pagliaro
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems , Provident Funding Associates, LP and Provident Funding Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. DAVOL, INC. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2010cv03135
Plaintiff:
Donald R. Smith
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.